Antibiotic Resistance, Food Safety and Human Illness, Public Policy

It’s All Antibiotic Free, Baby!

After all of the recent Panera and Chipotle hype about antibiotic free production, I decided to look at the data. This is also a follow up to my previous blog about antibiotic free (ABF) meat; I am going to present some data to back up my claim that there is very little difference between conventional and ABF – in other words, it’s all antibiotic free, baby! #ItsAllABF!

Due to farmers following appropriate withdrawal times, there are very few violations. In fact in the last three years of USDA testing no broiler chickens have been found with violative residues for the scheduled (random) sampling. For beef only 2 violations out of 1,600 samples were found and only 3 out of 2,200 from market hogs.  Note that antibiotics are not toxins, there are useful and very safe products used by us all.

The Bottom Line

The residue detection levels in the 3 classifications that I analyzed (beef cattle, market hogs, and broilers) are extremely small and well below the levels that would cause adverse effects to a human eating the meat. In addition, if an animal tests positive for residues, it does not enter the food supply.

Meat from an ABF farm would supposedly have zero levels of residues – but, if you aren’t going to get sick or be affected by the perfectly healthy, wholesome conventional meat, why should you pay more for something that potentially carries more foodborne illness?

From a veterinary perspective, I am concerned with the internal struggle that the ABF farmer must face. Most farmers get some premium for raising ABF meat, so if the animals get sick does the farmer treat and lose the financial benefits of ABF or wait a day or two? Waiting can increase mortality and spread of infectious disease significantly. What about the veterinarian, who has taken an oath to prevent animal suffering, but management will only let him treat a small percentage of the barns? Can these restaurateurs really argue their ABF meat provides a better “conscience choice,” if it comes at the cost of additional mortality and animal suffering?

For further clarification of the terms used above, here are some explanations:

The Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS), the inspection arm of the USDA, does sampling for a variety of residues in meat through the National Residue Program (NRP). They sample for many types of residues, including antibiotics as well as pesticides and environmental toxins. I will be discussing the combined NRP data from 2009, 2010, and 2011.

The Basic Definitions

Residue: A residue indicates that traces of a substance are present in meat. Residue does not mean that the substance is harmful, and it can be one of many classes of compounds. For antibiotics in particular, if a residue is present, it is likely due to the producer not waiting long enough after the animal was given antibiotics to send it to market (not following proper withdrawal guidelines).

Resistance: The presence of a residue in meat does not indicate antibacterial resistance. The two are separate issues. If resistance is detected, this means that there are bacteria on the meat that have tested resistant to one or more antibiotics. Resistance is measured and reported through the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). If resistance is detected, that does not mean there are residues; likewise, if a residue is found, that does not mean that there are resistant bacteria to that antibiotic.

Violative vs. Non-Violative Residues

Below, you will find 2 charts that list the percentage of both violative and non-violative residues in beef cows, market hogs, and broilers. There are 3 main levels for regulating residues in meat. The first is called acceptable daily intake, which is the highest level of a residue at which it is safe to consume the meat.  The second is called acceptable tolerance, which is the level at which a residue becomes “violative” if exceeded. The third is the detectable limit, which is significantly less than the acceptable tolerance and is the lowest level that the lab test can detect.

For example, here are the levels for tetracycline:

  • Acceptable daily intake: 25 micrograms/kg of body weight
  • Acceptable tolerance level in meat: 2 parts per million
  • Detectable level: 0.05 parts per million

A 165 lb person could consume up to 33 ounces of steak that contains the maximum allowable tetracycline residue (2 ppm) per day for the rest of their life and not feel any adverse effects. This is virtually impossible, because less than 1% of beef tested even comes close to this violation level.

In order for a meat sample to be called violative, it must test higher at levels than acceptable tolerance – it is essential to note, here, that even though this residue may be considered violative, it is still significantly below the level at which a person may begin to feel adverse effects.  A meat sample that is considered non-violative is one which tests positive for residues but is lower than the acceptable tolerance. Even though a residue may be detected, that by no means indicates that it will transfer to sickness or increased resistance in people. There are many factors at play here and the FDA has done extensive testing in order to clarify and regulate what is a safe food supply.

Testing Methods

Both of the charts below list violative and non-violative residues, but each represents a different sampling method. Table 1 represents a method called scheduled sampling, in which random meat samples are taken and tested for residues. This is an unbiased approach and is generally considered representative of the greater population. Table 2 represents another method called targeted sampling, in which only animals that appeared sick or abnormal are tested. This method is more biased, and generally more likely to have positive results because the animals are displaying abnormalities to begin with.

Table 1: Scheduled Sampling Antibiotic Residue Percentages by Classification

Antibiotic residues from scheduled sampling 2009-2011*

Production Class

Total sampled

Non-violative positives

% Non-violative positives

Violations

% Violations

Beef Cows

1629

4

0.25%

2

0.12%

Market Hogs

2237

45

2.01%

3

0.13%

Broilers

2093

11

0.53%

0

0%

Table 2: Targeted Sampling Antibiotic Residue Percentages by Classification

Antibiotic residues from targeted sampling 2009-2011*

Production Class

Total Sampled

Non-violative positives

% Non-violative positives

Violations

% Violations

Beef Cows

46522

488

1.05%

239

0.51%

Market Hogs

35210

218

0.62%

7

0.02%

 *Includes data from the following compound classes: Antibiotics, Chloramphenicol, Florfenicol, Nitrofurans, Nitroimidazole, Sulfonamides

Discussion

20 thoughts on “It’s All Antibiotic Free, Baby!

  1. I believe you meant to say, “For beef only 2 violations were found out of 1,600 samples collected and only 3 out of 2,200 from market hogs.” Yes?

    Posted by Ria de Grassi | August 22, 2013, 2:54 pm
  2. Scott, excellent data that should support some science behind any decisions made around antibiotic issues instead of trying to hide behind this idea ABF is providing some real protection for consumers.

    Posted by Jody Durand | August 27, 2013, 10:46 am
    • Thanks for your feedback! Are you in the agriculture industry or do you have an ag background?

      Posted by Dr. Scott Hurd | August 28, 2013, 4:06 pm
      • Scott I spent 15 yrs as a pork producer (dirt under the nails experience) and another 10 yrs in various sales roles including pharmaceutical, feed and equipment. The biggest reason for my concern is this “sliver of the population” making the shrinking number of pork producers struggle even harder (similar to stalls debate) when they are truly unaware of the tremendous strain our producers have been under for the last 6 yrs. Their narcissistic views of how we should operate is very frustrating. I really wish one of these truly concerned individuals could switch places with a family in a developing county that can only afford to buy pork once or twice/yr or the lower class in North America (right in our own neighbourhoods!) struggling to afford to buy our product- that might bring some valuable perspective to their concern’s. Rant over for now!

        Posted by Jody Durand | August 30, 2013, 10:13 am
      • Thanks for all that you do and have done for agriculture. We love to hear from those who have personal experience.

        Posted by Dr. Scott Hurd | August 30, 2013, 11:32 am
  3. Hello
    In find myself teaching an undergraduate animal science course on veterinary pharmaceutical issues. Can you furnish or guide me to data for acceptable tolerance levels of antibiotics in tissue in addition to tetracycline listed in this article? I want to show students that acceptable levels of antibiotics in tissue does not have to be zero.

    Thanks

    T.R. Reece DVM, MS, MPH DACVPM

    Posted by Thomas R Reece DVM MS MPH DACVPM | December 30, 2013, 11:08 pm
  4. What’s up it’s me, I am also visiting this site daily, this
    web site is genuinely nice and the users are truly sharing good thoughts.

    Posted by get twitter followers free and fast | April 19, 2014, 7:33 am
  5. The CHEMICAL&G eyewear won’t merely make you search lovely and fantastic, it’ll also safeguard your eyesight in the
    damaging aftereffects of UV rays from the solar and
    glare. A minor difference is that the frame of bifocal safety glasses often does not
    extend all-the-way round the lens.

    Posted by Alan | August 10, 2014, 7:27 pm
  6. I prefer to sort my e mails on a keyboard and discover that the phone can be a tougher
    to sort on. The Firefly also offers a 911 switch for
    emergency calls with and unintentional call deterrence characteristic.

    Posted by coupon Straight Talk | September 4, 2014, 6:11 pm
  7. The initial solution to get deals will be to minimize these from the Sunday classifieds.

    If you can depart these at home with your associate, that’s your
    best selection.

    Posted by http://caidevanzare.net | September 9, 2014, 10:30 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Is Chipotle having a moral awakening, or is it their pocketbook? | Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety - August 21, 2013

  2. Pingback: Should consumers insist on “antibiotic free” beef? - The Cattleman Plus - August 21, 2013

  3. Pingback: Silliness about Food Animal Antibiotic Use and Thoughts on Kennedy and Kessler’s Comments | Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety - August 29, 2013

  4. Pingback: Dr. Scott Hurd: Silliness about Food Animal Antibiotic Use and Thoughts on Kennedy and Kessler’s Comments | Kansas Ag Network - August 30, 2013

  5. Pingback: It’s All Antibiotic Free, Baby! | Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety | plantlawyer - September 3, 2013

  6. Pingback: Silliness About Food Animal Antibiotic Use; Thoughts on Kennedy, Kessler Comments | Food Safety News - September 9, 2013

  7. Pingback: Silliness About Food Animal Antibiotic Use; Thoughts on Kennedy, Kessler Comments » However, Therefore, Also, Wired, They, When, Although, Readers, Whether, Most, Food, Safety, News, MEDICINE » TheGlobalFruit - Covering food science, food safety, qualit - September 9, 2013

  8. Pingback: Panera and Chipotle not the only ones marketing ‘antibiotic-free’ | Andy Vance - September 25, 2013

  9. Pingback: Panera and Chipotle not the only ones marketing ‘antibiotic-free’ | Andy Vance - July 28, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Keep up with Hurd Health:


Expand2Web Twitter Feed

Expand2Web YouTube Link

Expand2Web Facebook Link

Expand2Web LinkedIn Profile

I hope you'll join the conversation with us!

Follow Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety on WordPress.com
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 181 other followers

%d bloggers like this: