Antibiotic Resistance, Food Safety and Human Illness, Lifestyle

Is antibiotic free really healthier?

We have had a great deal of discussion lately on meat raised without antibiotics. Is it  healthier product?  Does it taste better? Is it more tender?

In over 20 years of food safety research, I have seen quite a few antibiotic free (ABF) animals, including the famous pigs in Denmark, where they banned preventive and growth promoting antibiotics for pigs in 2000 (see a future blog). While working in the processing plant, I could often tell when ABF pigs were coming down the line.  The animals from the ABF farms usually appeared somewhat unthrifty.  Often there was less uniformity in carcass size and more “issues,” as one USDA inspector said to me.  In one study we found 2.7% of ABF pigs with abscesses in their heads compared to 0.7% in “conventional” pigs.

So what does this mean for the consumer?

Many think that conventional animals have antibiotics in the meat, officially called a residue. However, animals must undergo strict withdrawal periods prior to slaughter to ensure no illegal residues remain at processing. Farmers who sell meat with illegal residues are penalized. (Code of Federal Regulations).  Results from the National Residue Program show virtually all U.S. meat has no traces of antibiotics left in it. So it is “all” antibiotic free.   Therefore, since the established antibiotic residue tolerance levels are both safe and monitored, there is no increased public health risk from antibiotics in the meat.

Next is the question of antibiotic resistance due to on-farm antimicrobial use. This is a significant concern. The use of antibiotics in humans or animals will usually select for some resistant bacterial populations. FDA has taken actions to stop those on-farm practices it perceives as posing a human health risk (more on that in a future blog). However, as a general practice, the use of preventive antibiotics, even when given to the entire barn, has not been proven to pose a significant risk to humans. As I previously reported, all peer-reviewed risk assessments articles to date have shown no significant risk to public health from on farm use of antibiotics.

In fact, ABF reared animals may pose a greater risk to human health.  Pathogens are a common, unavoidable part of any environment.  Disease prevention is important for keeping animals healthy in such an environment.  In the absence of effective prevention, animals face greater health challenges that may lead to marginally healthy animals or subclinical illness.  My research has shown that subclinical illness is not outwardly obvious to the producer or inspector, but puts animals at risk for carrying increased levels of bacteria responsible for foodborne illness, such as Campylobacter and Salmonella.

Lastly, does ABF meat taste better, as the Panera advertisement claims?  I don’t see how, as conventional meat has no antibiotics left in it once the animals get to market.  Is ABF meat more tender?  I doubt it, as those animals may actually be older. You see chronic disease may slow down their growth rate. So it takes longer to get animals to market weight.

So is antibiotic free really healthier or better than conventional? I say the only difference is price.

Discussion

10 thoughts on “Is antibiotic free really healthier?

  1. Howdy, very interesting article about ABF it seems that this is a great mystery why there is such a lack of public knowledge especially in this the new era of health consciences about the facts that our meat supplies are free of antibiotics before they are processed. You would think the beef, pork, poultry industry would be hyping this all the time in any advertisement. My only question is how can the millions and millions of animals being processed be checked to make sure they are all ABF? And what about other chemicals that animals might have in their systems such as pesticides, toxins, or growth hormones?

    Posted by Douglas | August 12, 2013, 11:11 am
    • Excellent questions! I will be addressing the subject of antibiotic residues further this week. Until then, the short answer is that the USDA and processors employ a system of sampling to check for and track the occurrence of residues at the packing plant. Just like every company that produces a product, the quality assurance process does not involve checking every product coming off the line but instead samples a subset to ensure quality measures are consistently being met. It is the same in meat packing plants, and those results are monitored and reported by the USDA through the National Residue Program (NRP). The NRP monitors over 100 different residues including pesticides, toxins, drugs and hormones. In addition to random sampling, there is a targeted sampling program which looks for potential signs of recent antibiotic use. When violations do occur, a list of repeat violators is published to keep producers in check and help plant personnel identify producers that have had residue issues in the past.

      Posted by Dr. Scott Hurd | August 12, 2013, 5:17 pm
    • There is a quote from Mark Twain that answers part of your mystery. He said, ” A lie can travel around the world while the truth is still busy tying its shoes.” Much of the public finds the lie easier to believe than the truth, and the unexciting truth rarely grabs headlines. Illness or death from tainted products draws headlines,even if they are very uncommon, that is all people will remember. The truth about how safe our food supply is, does not draw a single eyeball.

      Posted by Michael | September 24, 2013, 6:51 pm
  2. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your website.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to
    come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to
    create your theme? Exceptional work!

    Posted by http://flipkart.couponmaya.in/ | March 9, 2014, 1:36 pm
  3. Hello to all, how is everything, I think every one is getting more from this site, and your views are pleasant in
    support of new people.

    Posted by Qa Training | March 29, 2014, 10:04 pm
  4. This is the perfect site for anyone who wants to find out about this topic.
    You know so much its almost hard to argue with
    you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin on a subject which has been discussed for
    decades. Great stuff, just wonderful!

    Posted by best Malware removal 2014 | July 20, 2014, 10:53 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Reply to National Resources Defense Council Article: “Nature’s Take on Antibiotic Resistance and Some Troubling Responses” | Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety - August 13, 2013

  2. Pingback: It’s All Antibiotic Free, Baby! | Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety - August 14, 2013

  3. Pingback: It’s All Antibiotic Free, Baby! - Let's Talk Farm Animals - September 9, 2013

  4. Pingback: Panera and Chipotle not the only ones marketing ‘antibiotic-free’ | Andy Vance - July 28, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Keep up with Hurd Health:


Expand2Web Twitter Feed

Expand2Web YouTube Link

Expand2Web Facebook Link

Expand2Web LinkedIn Profile

I hope you'll join the conversation with us!

Follow Hurd Health: Animal Health and Food Safety on WordPress.com
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 182 other followers

%d bloggers like this: